Is
the city the best place for our best and brightest mathematicians and
economists ?
It
is the year 2013 and bonuses are firmly back in the city. With them, incentives
for bright and motivated individuals are back, with pay packets standing at
multiples of the salaries offered in other industries such as engineering and
medicine.
Concurrent
to this, the city is beginning to become more and more quantitatively difficult
market, replaced with a mathematically-able “quant “ who uses complicated
algorithms to determine success. Maths plays a bigger role in the city than
ever, with strong pHD level mathematical ability a pre-requisite for many jobs
in the city.
As
such, mathematics and economics graduates are being tempted into the city,
lured by an image of glamour, prestige and high pay. Any student at a top UK
university is almost guaranteed to have seen or have been inundated by offers
for employment from top investment banks, many of whom going on to accept these
same offers.
One
has to question whether the abilities of these graduates could be employed
better elsewhere. Does the city really contribute that much to us both as a
society and as an economy? Whilst bankers are often in the highest tax band,
banks and other large corporations have employed complex tax avoidance methods
and, of course, have speculated wildly, precipitating the financial crisis,
causing untold economic and social woe both nationally and globally.
Whilst
speculation is a valid profit-generating activity for banks and other
investors, we must be careful to regulate it so as to prevent another crisis.
One has to question whether bright minds could be employed more creatively, and
we must ensure that they are not employed destructively.
No comments:
Post a Comment